Trump Signals Tough Stance on Iran After Meeting Netanyahu, Reminds Tehran of ‘Midnight Hammer’

WASHINGTON, Feb 12, 2026 In a high-profile meeting at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, US President Donald Trump reiterated a stern warning to Iran, invoking the term “Midnight Hammer”—a reference to US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities last year—if Tehran fails to make progress in diplomatic talks.

Saying, “Last time Iran decided that they were better off not making a deal, and they were hit with Midnight Hammer—that did not work well for them,” Trump posted on his social media platform after the roughly three-hour discussion. He underscored that negotiations remain the preferred path but did not rule out other outcomes if diplomacy stalls again.

Focus on Diplomacy With a Warning

While Trump emphasized that continuing talks with Iran is his first choice, he made clear that failure to reach an agreement could lead to consequences reminiscent of prior military action. Officials described the meeting as cordial but not concluding any definitive Iran strategy beyond the push for diplomacy.

The phrase “Midnight Hammer” refers to a June 2025 operation in which the United States struck multiple Iranian nuclear sites, signaling Washington’s willingness to employ force when negotiations break down.

Balancing Act With Israel

Trump and Netanyahu also discussed regional security matters, including developments in Gaza and continued coordination on shared interests. Netanyahu’s visit—one of several high-level meetings between the leaders in recent months—reflected ongoing efforts to align US and Israeli approaches to Tehran’s nuclear program and broader regional influence.

The Road Ahead

As both governments weigh diplomatic options, the administration has maintained a significant military presence in the Middle East and prepared contingency plans. Sanctions, negotiations, and the possibility of renewed pressure on Iran shape a tense backdrop to the talks.

The Bottom Line: Trump’s remarks after the White House meeting combine a preference for diplomacy with an unmistakable message to Tehran—early military action may be remembered and could resurface if negotiations falter again. Analysts say this dual approach reflects Washington’s effort to manage the delicate balance between negotiation and deterrence in an increasingly volatile region.