Header Image

Madras High Court Restrains Activist from Defaming Vedic Scholar Dushyanth Sridhar

Madras High Court Restrains Activist from Defaming Vedic Scholar Dushyanth Sridhar

Last Updated Jul - 14 - 2025, 04:50 PM | Source : Fela News

The Madras High Court has barred activist Rangarajan Narasimhan from posting defamatory content against Vedic scholar Dushyanth Sridhar on social media, grantin
Madras High Court Restrains Activist from Defaming Vedic Scholar Dushyanth Sridhar
Madras High Court Restrains Activist from Defaming Vedic Scholar Dushyanth Sridhar
The Madras High Court has issued an interim injunction preventing temple activist Rangarajan Narasimhan from making defamatory remarks about Vedic scholar and orator Dushyanth Sridhar on social media platforms, particularly X and YouTube. The order will remain in effect until the court resolves a defamation suit filed earlier this year by Sridhar, who is seeking ₹1 crore in damages for alleged abusive and derogatory statements made by Narasimhan online.
 
Sridhar, who resides in Bengaluru, filed the suit in February and also requested permission to initiate the case in Chennai, arguing that many of his followers are based there and that part of the cause of action had occurred in the city. Senior counsel Satish Parasaran cited rulings from the UK House of Lords (Turner vs. Grovit, 2011) and the High Court of Australia (Dow Jones vs. Gutnick, 2022) to support Sridhar’s right to choose a convenient legal forum.
 
Agreeing with this reasoning, Justice K. Kumaresh Babu granted leave to file the case in Chennai on June 23, 2025, and ordered the court registry to register the suit. When hearing the plea for interim relief, the court gave Narasimhan four weeks to file a reply.
 
The judge noted that Narasimhan had admitted to making certain statements about Sridhar during earlier proceedings but claimed they were not defamatory. However, after reviewing the content, Justice Babu concluded that the statements appeared prima facie defamatory and granted the injunction.
 
Sridhar’s lawyer, advocate Rahul Balaji, told the court that Narasimhan routinely posts offensive content targeting various individuals. He presented screenshots of disparaging comments aimed at a senior advocate, apparently made to discourage the lawyer from representing Sridhar.
 
Justice Babu, deeming those remarks inappropriate, also restrained Narasimhan from making any statements in the future against legal representatives of his opponents in court cases.
 

Share :

Trending this week

BJP Unveils 71 Candidates

Oct - 14 - 2025

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has taken a big step in its Bihar election campaign by releasing names of 71 first candidates for the 2025 Assembl... Read More

One Survivor Endless Haunting

Oct - 14 - 2025

On June 12, a plane took off as one expects, but within seconds, disaster struck. AI-171 plummeted inexplicably into a building near Ahmedabad airp... Read More

Haryana DGP Sent on Leave Amid

Oct - 14 - 2025

In a significant development, Haryana's Director General of Police (DGP), Shatrujeet Kapur, was sent on forced leave late Monday night amid growing... Read More

Deadly Cough Syrup Scandal Shakes

Oct - 13 - 2025

The recent tragedy in Madhya Pradesh has drawn nationwide attention: 22 children lost their lives after consuming contaminated cough syrup, and now... Read More

Durgapur Gangrape Outrage A

Oct - 13 - 2025

 

A shocking crime in Durgapur, West Bengal, has captured the nation’s attention. A 23 year old medical student from Odisha was ... Read More

Father Speaks Out Daughter

Oct - 13 - 2025

 

In a recent and very disturbing turn, the father of a 23 year old medical student from Odisha has strongly denied the West Bengal Ch... Read More