In a significant escalation of the ongoing inheritance dispute, the children of late industrialist Sunjay Kapur and actor Karisma Kapoor, Samaira and Kiaan Kapur, have reportedly sought criminal action against their father’s widow, Priya Kapur. The latest move has intensified what is already a closely watched and emotionally charged family legal battle.
At the centre of the dispute is a will that allegedly transfers the majority of Sunjay Kapur’s vast estate to Priya Kapur and their child. Samaira and Kiaan have questioned the authenticity of this document, raising concerns over possible forgery and procedural irregularities. According to their claims, the manner in which the will was submitted and presented before the Delhi High Court lacks transparency and raises serious legal doubts.
Sources familiar with the case indicate that the children’s legal representatives have pointed to several inconsistencies in the documentation and digital records linked to the will. These alleged anomalies, they argue, weaken the credibility of the document and justify the need for a criminal investigation rather than confining the matter to a civil inheritance dispute. Given the enormous value of the estate involved, the children maintain that the issue warrants strict legal scrutiny.
The inheritance row began after Sunjay Kapur’s sudden death in June 2025, when he reportedly suffered a fatal cardiac incident during a polo match. In the months that followed, the dispute grew into a complex legal conflict involving multiple members of the Kapur family, including Sunjay’s mother and sisters, his former wife Karisma Kapoor, and his surviving spouse Priya Kapur. The will has remained the focal point of repeated court proceedings, with Samaira and Kiaan seeking access to the original document for verification.
Priya Kapur’s legal team has denied all allegations of wrongdoing. They have consistently maintained that the will was executed lawfully and accurately reflects Sunjay Kapur’s final wishes. Earlier hearings have already witnessed arguments related to jurisdiction, overseas assets, and alleged concealment of information, further complicating the proceedings.
The demand for criminal action marks a decisive turning point in the dispute, potentially transforming it from a private inheritance matter into one involving criminal liability. As proceedings continue in the Delhi High Court, public and legal attention remains fixed on the outcome, with each new development adding further complexity to this high-profile family dispute.
