Court Restrains CarryMinati Over Defamation Dispute

In a notable legal development within the entertainment world, a Mumbai court has temporarily restrained popular YouTuber CarryMinati, whose real name is Ajey Nagar, from posting or circulating any allegedly defamatory content concerning filmmaker Karan Johar. The order follows a defamation suit filed by Johar, who claimed that certain videos uploaded online were damaging to his reputation.

According to details presented before the court, the content in question allegedly contained remarks and language that were considered objectionable. Johar’s legal team argued that even though some of the videos were later deleted, they had already been viewed widely and were continuing to circulate in different forms across digital platforms. This, they said, was causing reputational harm.

The civil court observed that the matter required careful consideration and issued an interim order restricting the YouTuber and others associated with the content from posting, reposting, or promoting similar material until further hearings take place. The directive also applies to the circulation of clips, interviews, or any related versions of the content that could be seen as defamatory.

CarryMinati’s representatives reportedly stated that the original videos had been removed and that there was no intention to continue any such content. However, the court found it appropriate to grant temporary protection, given the seriousness of defamation allegations and the speed at which online material can spread.

The case highlights the growing tension between digital content creators and public figures, especially when satire, commentary, or parody crosses into disputed territory. In today’s digital age, content once uploaded can remain accessible in fragments even after deletion, making legal remedies more complicated.

Legal experts note that interim injunctions like this are often granted to prevent further potential harm while the main case is being examined. Future hearings will determine whether the restriction will remain in place permanently or be modified based on arguments presented by both sides.

For now, the order signals that courts are increasingly willing to intervene in online disputes where reputational damage is alleged, underlining the evolving legal landscape surrounding digital expression.