In a fresh twist in their ongoing personal and legal saga, Hasin Jahan has publicly branded Indian pacer Mohammed Shami a “womaniser.” She alleges that Shami is allegedly spending lakhs on his mistress’s kids, all while overlooking the educational needs of their 10-year-old daughter, Ayra.

The accusation arrives amid a complex backdrop of alimony disputes and serious past allegations including domestic abuse. Shami was previously ordered by the Calcutta High Court to pay ₹4 lakh monthly as interim maintenance ₹1.5 lakh for Hasin and ₹2.5 lakh for Ayra raising eyebrows on social media and drawing public attention to his family responsibilities.

Hasin’s bold statement calling him a “womaniser” is more than just emotional rhetoric. It strikes at the heart of the controversy: That Shami is allegedly spending money on another family, while ignoring the needs of his own child. The allegation already enhances a heated controversy, including his public image, legal responsibilities and social expectations.

This fresh claim for Shami further increases the pressure, causing them to face personal allegations and public investigation. He will issue its official denial or leave the matter to the legal process; it is not clear yet. From a public standpoint, the unfolding drama raises questions about parenting, accountability, and the responsibilities of public figures especially when legal systems and personal lives collide. Whatever transpires next, one thing is clear: this situation continues to unfold under the intense glare of media and public interest.